Should we continue to use OSCommerce for payment handling and invoice presentation?
Submitted by dkwiebe on Fri, 2008-11-07 01:31.
Yes, keep it like it is and add more "Customer Portal" features into OSCommerce.
44% (27 votes)
No, we should build our own links to Authorize.net and Paypal.
56% (35 votes)
Total votes: 62
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments
Payment Handling and Invoice Presentation
This project is a go. As soon as I get the Freeswitch support stabilized and tested a little more I'll be working on this.
To OSC or NOT
Perhaps we can do both. As DW said, keeping OSC requires very little maintenance. At the same time, astpp requires is mostly just a payment processor and not a full blown web store. So, perhaps the most popular authorize.net, paypal, 2checkout etc can be natively incorporated into astpp, tighter integration and more auditable.
--
wasim h baig | convergence.pk | +92 300 850 8070 | helping voip take over!
Community Input
We really need input from the community on this as there are several different schools of thought.
Currently all links with payment processors are handled in oscommerce. This works fine for the most part but it is not one unified application. Adding the links to payment processors as well as the sign up screens to astpp would certainly be a substantial amount of work but with help from the community it wouldn't take that long. However, I don't see ASTPP functioning as a full fledged web store. That's not really the direction that is heading.